I used to think regulation just meant more bureaucracy and slower launches, but I’ve learned the hard way that the real danger is when platforms don’t prepare for it at all. I was in a project where they bragged about being totally borderless and decentralized, which sounded cool until they got hit with fines in two countries and were forced to geo-block users. The token tanked and never recovered. People say the tech matters most, but honestly, if a platform can’t legally operate in key markets, the tech doesn’t save it. What helped me rethink how I evaluate these projects was reading through https://coinranking.com/blog/regulation-impact-igaming-valuation/. It breaks down how a platform’s compliance status can actually add to its value — because investors see it as lower risk, and users feel more secure. That changed how I view licensing — not as red tape, but as a green flag. If a team is transparent about where they’re registered and how they handle player protections, I’m way more likely to trust them. Now I focus more on legal structure than hype, because I’ve seen too many “hot” projects go cold overnight.
top of page

AFEB Team
Öffentlich·273 Mitglieder
5 Ansichten
Mitglieder
- Mike Ross
- ChatGPT Gratuit
- Joni Bowni
- Nadia Fishman
- Martin Harris
bottom of page
Sometimes I wonder if part of the appeal in this space is the unpredictability. One day everything looks solid, the next you're reading updates that sound like damage control. Even when you think you’re being smart, there’s always that variable you didn’t plan for. That risk — it’s exhausting and exciting at the same time.